Keunhee Park: the Question of Transparency in Relation to Identity and Truth

by Chunbum Park

Installation View of “Maze”
Installation View of “Maze”

At Keunhee Park’s solo exhibition, MAZE, at the Riverside Gallery in Hackensack, NJ, sculptures that alternate between the modes of transparent glass and opaque wood manifest themselves in succinct metaphors about the nature of identity and being. While Park’s work appears purely abstract with only formal concerns on the surface, it is totally concerned with the real world and, in particular, the human world and the questions of identity.

These sculptures contain forms that turn in rectilinear fashion like a literal 3-dimensional maze or snake game that maps out the possible pathways of movement and/or communication link. They carry the vestiges of certain conceptual and instruction-based works by the likes of Sol Lewitt, whose work including Floor-Wall Grid (1966) would stand as an example of the grid that Rosalind Krauss would write about in her seminal 1979 essay describing the use of grid as a powerful motif to bring about a new vocabulary that did not exist prior and as a language of the abstract realm that distinguishes itself from the “real” world.

The rectilinear geometry would manifest itself throughout history, whether the perspectival space or the windows in modern painting like Matisse’s masterpieces, as Krauss would point out in her writing. The grid as a window acknowledges the “frame” that exists outside or within the inner dimensions of the artwork. In Park’s grid-like constructions, the spatial dynamics is highly organized and curated with a specific set of rules and conventions in which the spatial dynamics come together. These underlying codes of spatial turns and projections suggest a fundamental language or building block as we see in the form of pixels on a computer display or the bricks of a virtual world.

“Maze” Series by Keunhee Park
“Maze” Series by Keunhee Park

Why does a pathway suddenly change direction as if it were being stopped by something and were seeking an alternate path? Why does it continue to move uninterrupted in a straight line from certain positions?

Park’s sculptures represent the self and how we navigate the world or the environment in which the self exists, which is ultimately in relation to the other selves that occupy different positions in space time. Very interesting theories abound in physics that may inform our understanding of existence and the cosmos, including the fact that the electrons are virtually indistinguishable from one another. What if we were the electrons, but we were the same person, just spread out across various points in the space time continuum?

Particular portions of the sculptures alternate between the materials of wood and glass, as if to equate transparency with honesty and opacity with secrecy of the inner self. It is important to identify the difference between the surface and the core in relation to the question of identity, and Park’s sculptures in part reflect this binary relationship. Were the core of the self to become more visible, it must become more transparent and honest, yet the being or the object becomes less clearly defined, more susceptible to the influence of the surrounding elements (such as light and reflections), and more vulnerable. The opposite is true of opacity; with secrecy, the being or the object becomes less honest, yet it is also more protected and less vulnerable.

This is the contradictory and ironic condition of the universe and existence. Why do humans value honesty and integrity so much in a world where one must pay more to uphold such noble ideals?

In another reading of Park’s sculptures, the transparent glass portions may suggest the imaginary or the imagined decisions and outcomes, whereas the opaque wooden parts may suggest what is real in the status quo, prior to the event of imagination that spawns subsequent actions. Park’s works may also reflect on human existence as a mix of the imaginary and the real structures. The imaginary and the real differentiate into the realm of social and political structures, economic structures, and so on in the imaginary, and the physical structures in the real.

Human structures are not only made of tangible objects but also the symbolic and aesthetic objects, to which Park’s Maze series belongs in reality. Ultimately, it is important to consider the alternate histories of what could have happened had we taken the other path. This is because alternative history and imagination allow us to critique and to reform the sociopolitical and economic structures, as well as the individual being (in terms of one’s condition and circumstances), in the status quo. Park’s sculptures may have begun as the artist’s reflection of a life lived, in which he had to struggle numerous times throughout life, only to become an artist, which in and of itself is a path of multiple struggles. However, the Maze series also carries a universal value and meaning because it is a human nature and condition to struggle and to seek out a decision at the crossroads.

Keunhee Park: MAZE, June 19 – July 6, 2026, 1 Riverside Square, Suite 201, Hackensack, NJ 07601

Christopher Rouleau: Selling Canada

by Steve Rockwell

Christopher Rouleau, 2026, 12 Brilliant Colors, Latex, acrylic and enamel on canvas, 54" × 72"
Christopher Rouleau, 2026, 12 Brilliant Colors, Latex, acrylic and enamel on canvas, 54″ × 72″

The message in Christopher Rouleau’s “12 Brilliant Colors” exhibition is direct. If you don’t get the picture, he spells it out in two languages, each ‘brilliant color’ numbered from one to twelve. The charm of the artist’s work at the Red Head Gallery in Toronto is the absence of ambiguity. Rouleau’s ego never gets in the way of his painted intent. By not wearing his angry, tormented artist tuque, the “Selling of Canada” paintings strike us directly where we live – a “double-double” caffeine-induced sugar rush from a Tim Hortons cup of coffee.

Christopher Rouleau, 2026, Tons, latex and acrylic on plywood, 24 x 18 x 1/2 inch; Ketchup Wars, latex and acrylic on canvas, bubble mailer filling, 36 x 18 x 2 inches; Loss, latex and enamel on canvas-wrapped box, 18 x 18 x 18 inches
Christopher Rouleau, 2026, Tons, latex and acrylic on plywood, 24 x 18 x 1/2 inch; Ketchup Wars, latex and acrylic on canvas, bubble mailer filling, 36 x 18 x 2 inches; Loss, latex and enamel on canvas-wrapped box, 18 x 18 x 18 inches

To a Canadian, each meticulously-rendered image is a mental billboard along the highway of Canada’s history. As an immigrant kid on my first day at Golden Avenue Public School in South Porcupine, my own pack of “12 Brilliant Colors” landed on my desk on the first day of school. That’s how I remember it – cellophane-wrapped pencil crayons with a picture of a snow-covered log home below the word “Laurentian,” loosely-lettered in red.

The “Selling of Canada” has continued unabated since its confederation in 1867. In fact, even before there was a Canada there was Rupert’s Land. French fur traders Radison and Groseilliers learned that the best furs were found around the “frozen sea” of Hudson Bay. Since the French governor refused to back their plan to set up a trading post on the Bay, one thing led to another, until the fur trading duo got an audience with England’s Charles II through Prince Rupert, the king’s cousin. And the rest is history: the “Selling of Canada” began in earnest by the Hudson’s Bay Company with an act of government in 1689. “Made Beaver” became not just a brand but a commercial trading standard.

Christopher Rouleau's "Selling Canada" installation view
Christopher Rouleau’s “Selling Canada” installation view

Rouleau’s “12 Brilliant Colors” are rooted in the beauty of the land itself, here specifically the Quebec Laurentians, a crayon for every month of the year. A century ago, the Group of Seven placed a national stamp over the color and texture over Canada’s landscape. Influenced importantly by Tom Thomson, the Group expanded northward through Algoma beyond Lake Superior to the Rockies and the Arctic. To the east Quebec’s Charlevoix and Laurentian regions supplied the drama of shoreline and mountain. Branded into the consciousness these images in oil served as advertisement readymades for Canadian National and Pacific railways to sell travel across “Scenic Canada.” If going by car, vacationers might as well ride on “Canadian Tires.”

Christopher Rouleau, 2026, HBCanadian Tire, Latex and acrylic on canvas, 30" × 60"
Christopher Rouleau, 2026, HBCanadian Tire, Latex and acrylic on canvas, 30″ × 60″

While Rouleau’s “Selling Canada” works are admittedly nostalgic, tapping into decades of collective memory, their insinuation casts a deeper, more complex shadow. As hieroglyphs of national identity, by virtue of their visual familiarity, the viewer is rendered essentially defenceless to their impact. Much like the work of Jeff Koons, Rouleau’s paintings here are “critic-proof.” To whatever might be said about his show, an apt response by the artist might simply be, “I intended it.”

Christopher Rouleau's "Selling Canada" installation view
Christopher Rouleau’s “Selling Canada” installation view

To some extent, Rouleau even seems not to be “wedded” to the paintings on display. “Selling Canada” may be read as a sample documentation of slices from our environment, mechanically reproduced. As the artist’s “Christopher” business card reads: “lettering, signs, graphic design,” implying that if the viewer were not impressed with the paintings display, he would be happy to provide ones more suitable to their taste.

Selling Canada: Guest Artist Christopher Rouleau, May 27 – June 20, 2026 at the Red Head Gallery, 401 Richmond Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5V 3A8

To Be a Fool or Not To Be

by Chunbum Park

Xinyu Liu, Fool’s Hour (2025), ​​acrylic, motor, 43 inches (diameter)

Xinyu Liu, a multidexterous artist engaging with a variety of media, exhibits her work in a solo presentation at Art Cake in Brooklyn, titled, “Fool’s Hour.” Liu conceives of her body of work as revolving around the experience of a person going to an amusement park or a casino, where the busy sense of time within a 9 to 5 work schedule is lost. What makes someone a fool, and what is the meaning behind the title, ‘fool’s hour?’ Liu is catching on the subtle difference between how we label ourselves and others, as winners and losers, as rich or poor, and as a fool and non-fool. There are many contradictory considerations and occurrences that go into deciding how someone might be a fool. For example, the exorbitant use of money might make someone a fool because s/he or they are wasting their financial resources, yet such a use might also count as a sign of wealth and thereby not foolish. Power relations are reversible, depending on the context and the signifying traits.

In “Fool’s Hour” (2025), we see a circular structure encasing segments of a rollercoaster ride, made in transparent acrylic. Numbers flip between 6 and 9, and a clown’s hat with three arms carries spherical tips on two of the arms but not the third one. What the work shows is a contained sense of time, in which time ceases to go forward linearly but condenses into a cyclical form. This is the Fool’s Hour, in which the subject is free to be a fool of the capitalist system that wants to extract as much money from the subject as possible.

“Time is not lost, it is freed” (2025) is a wood-carved sculpture in the form of some kind of casing for a glasses or pen, a jewelry box, or a miniature burial vault. The phrase looks like an old proverb, but it is a reaction to Benjamin Franklin’s belief that “lost time is never found again.” What we must conclude from this train of logic is that time is not lost, but it must be freed and wrestled away through a match or struggle with the capitalist system that seeks to deprive us of time. This is the question that each and every person living within the reality of a capitalist world must deal with. To be a fool or not to be, that is the question.

Xinyu Liu, Time Is Not Lost, It Is Freed (2025), ​​hand-carved wood, 6.5 x 1.5 x 4 inches

Xinyu Liu: Fool’s Hour on April 17-May 10, 2026 at Artcake, 214 40th Street, Brooklyn, NY 11232

Time and Materials

by Federico Lynch Ferraris

Nadia Coen, Mahmoud Hamadani, Armita Raafat, Michael David, Andrew Huston, Alyse Rosner, Paul Michael Graves, Bodo Korsig, Steven Salzman, Margaret Weber, Mark Williams
at Bienvenu Steinberg & C
in New York City

Across painting, sculpture, and installation, “Time and Materials” highlights the use of unconventional materials – glass, resin, plastic straws, fabrics, and carpets – to create works that are both temporal and tactile. Many of the works lean abstract, inviting the viewer to consider the significance embedded in the use of obscure materials and the progression of time encoded in the art.

Paul Michael Graves, Fig. CXXXVIII., 2024, oil on canvas, 48 x 48 in, 121.9 x 121.9 cm
Paul Michael Graves, Fig. CXXXVIII., 2024, oil on canvas, 48 x 48 in, 121.9 x 121.9 cm

The exhibition repeatedly emphasizes material experimentation as an outlet for interdisciplinary expression. Paul Michael Graves’ pieces play with the intersection between art and his previous career as a helicopter pilot. Composed of black dots and lines set across a bronze background, the pieces evoke the visual components of aerial map making. Initially appearing abstract, the artwork deliberately uses the black marks to resemble plotted coordinates and flight paths as seen from above. Graves’ interpretation of time reflects the broader theme of the unique experience of time. The pieces display time and duration through flight paths rather than fixed units.

Mahmoud Hamadani’s geometric compositions similarly gesture towards his mathematical foundations. In his untitled work, Hamadani arranges nine black frames into a square. Within each frame, seven diamonds are uniquely oriented, with each diamond representing a day of the week. The subtle variations within each frame mirror the rhythms and changes of days and weeks. Continuing the larger theme of time interpreted through interdisciplinary practices, Hamadani’s geometric orientations suggest that time is measured, rhythmic, and symmetrical through a mathematical lens.

Installation view with work by Steven Salzman's  Steaws III and Straws X (left), and Andrew Huston's Days of the week (right)
Installation view with work by Steven Salzman‘s Steaws III and Straws X (left), and Andrew Huston‘s Days of the week (right)

Andrew Huston continues the use of geometric shapes to portray time. With seven panels, each filled with gold pigment and black dots, the artwork represents the seven days of the week. Although the panels are fixedly aligned to emulate calendar pages, each panel is distinct. The variation among the series of panels emphasises the unpredictability of time despite the expected rhythm of the week.

Armita Raafat, Untitled, 2019, resin, paper mâché, tiles, fabric, mesh tiles, fabric, mesh, and acrylic, 38 x 80 x 7 in, 96.5 x 203.2 x 17.8 cm
Armita Raafat, Untitled, 2019, resin, paper mâché, tiles, fabric, mesh tiles, fabric, mesh, and acrylic, 38 x 80 x 7 in, 96.5 x 203.2 x 17.8 cm

Armita Raafat’s portrayal of time draws on a more fluid interpretation, by contrast. Raafat draws on traditional Muqarnas while reimagining it with vivid, unconventional materials. Composed of resin, tiles, and fabrics, the work revisits traditional architecture with a modern perspective, suggesting that time, rather than being fixed, can be actively returned to and reconsidered. The piece, being an extension of Raafat’s inquiry into Muqarnas, maintains the ongoing theme of interests and passions altering perception of time found throughout the exhibition.

Bodo Korsig, Tears of Silence, 2023, 7.9 × 10.2 in, 20 x 26 cm
Bodo Korsig, Tears of Silence, 2023, 7.9 × 10.2 in, 20 x 26 cm

Bodo Korsig’s “Zerspringen des Zustandes”, which translates from German to “Shattering of the State”, approaches the theme of time through one moment of rupture. The work suggests that time does not only unfold – it snaps. The “shattering” becomes a moment when continuity is lost, and a new state abruptly emerges. This interpretation of time aligns with Korsig’s focus on human behavior under extreme conditions. In moments of fear or violence, mental states often do not erode over time; they shatter instantly. The piece introduces the irreversibility of time and its capacity to collapse into a single moment of change. In contrast to other works in the exhibition, which focus on the cycle and rhythm of time, Korsig centers its immediacy and instantaneity.

Alyse Rosner, From Wind or Sky or Myth (quiet pink), 2025, acrylic on raw pine, 6 x 5.5 in, 15.2 x 14 cm
Alyse Rosner, From Wind or Sky or Myth (quiet pink), 2025, acrylic on raw pine, 6 x 5.5 in, 15.2 x 14 cm
Michael David, The Batman, 2023-26, mirrored glass, silicone, fabric, glitter, acrylic and oil paint on wooden panels, 147 x 82 x 6 in, 373.4 x 208.3 x 15.2 cm
Michael David, The Batman, 2023-26, mirrored glass, silicone, fabric, glitter, acrylic and oil paint on wooden panels, 147 x 82 x 6 in, 373.4 x 208.3 x 15.2 cm

Alyse Rosner’s piece, “From Wind or Sky or Myth (shadow)” evokes the visual intensity of fireworks – brief yet expansive bursts that unfold simultaneously – suggesting that time is not a singular passing instant, but a convergence of multiple moments occurring at once.
Some works do not specifically reference time, however. Instead, they fall under the exhibition’s material aspect. Michael David, for example, uses nontraditional materials such as glass, silicone, fabric, and glitter in his work, “The Batman”. Innovative uses of various materials are also present in the works of Nadia Coen, Steven Salzman, Margaret Weber, and Mark Williams.

Margaret Weber, Rivington or Wat, 2025, newspaper (newsprint), oil pastel, dye, acrylic paint, cardboard, 24 x 33.8 in, 61 x 85.7 cm
Margaret Weber, Rivington or Wat, 2025, newspaper (newsprint), oil pastel, dye, acrylic paint, cardboard, 24 x 33.8 in, 61 x 85.7 cm
Mark Williams, PoC 47, 2022, oil, acrylic & pencil on cardboard, 24 x 30 in, 61 x 76.2 cm
Mark Williams, PoC 47, 2022, oil, acrylic & pencil on cardboard, 24 x 30 in, 61 x 76.2 cm

The title of the exhibition draws on the policy under which clients pay contractors a fixed amount for the time spent and materials used. In the context of the exhibition, time and material are established as intertwined and in constant conversation.

Alexey von Schlippe: Expressions of Mind and Soul

Slater Memorial Museum, Norwich, CT

by D. Dominick Lombardi

Alexey von Schlippe (1915-1988) left his title as a Russian Baron in the court of Tsar Nicholas II behind when he became a citizen of the United States in 1960. What emerged in his art during and after this transition, was a unique sort of social realism, not unlike the immediacy and empathy in the egg tempera paintings of Ben Shahn, but with more intimacy and isolation.

Still Life with Mushrooms (1974), oil on board, 3 ½ x 7 ½ inches, all images
courtesy of the author
Still Life with Mushrooms (1974), oil on board, 3 ½ x 7 ½ inches, all images courtesy of the author

As part of the introduction to the exhibit, a descriptive wall panel mentions Von Schlippe’s inspiration from Giotto and Piero Della Francesca, which is clear in his dry brush technique common in the ancient art of egg tempera painting, an approach Von Schlippe manages even when he paints with oils. The text also mentions the influence of West African art that shows up in various ways including subject matter featuring a black woman with an exposed upper body ala mid-century National Geographic magazine, abrupt perspective in terms of the stylized masks and adornments, and anatomical simplification of the same. Beyond these influences, the content presented in Von Schlippe’s paintings has many psychological traits that break through. Additionally, and Like Andrew Wyeth who also masterfully worked with egg tempera capturing the distinctive souls of his subjects that he knew well, Von Schlippe’s way with egg tempera finds a less individual representation of a specific soul. Von Schlippe takes a more universal approach to the harm imposed on an oppressed group longing to be treated with the respect they deserve in an age of drastic social change.

Reclining Figure with White Blouse (undated, mid twentieth century), egg tempera with oil on masonite, 24 ¼ x 48 inches
Reclining Figure with White Blouse (undated, mid twentieth century), egg tempera with oil on masonite, 24 ¼ x 48 inches

The paintings in this exhibition were created between the late 1950’s to the early 1980’s when America went through much social unrest and change. A fact that you can feel emanating from his female subjects in particular, which are often people of color seemingly exhausted by the burdens that come with living through troubled times. In Reclining Figure with White Blouse (undated, mid twentieth century) you get a sense of temporary peace as a compositional chrysalis forms around the figure. In this dream state, the harshness of the outside world is quietly absorbed in waves of harmless cleansing transitions within that subtle enclosure. And despite the metaphorical cushioning, there remains tension in the bent arms and fisted hands as they respond to indelible memories of repressive circumstances.

Exhibited directly below Reclining Figure with White Blouse is Reclining Figure (1980), which features a middle aged woman who still wears her simple black shoes – a detail that does not appear in any of the other paintings that all feature bare footed subjects. Reclining Figure also has more clarity of the figure that includes more realistic facial features, sharp pleats in a long skirt, a formal couch and hands set in a classic sleep, prayer-like pose giving this particular person a feeling of security and personal importance. Perhaps it’s someone who is related to the artist.

Reclining Figure (1980), egg tempera with oil on canvas, 24 x 48 inches
Reclining Figure (1980), egg tempera with oil on canvas, 24 x 48 inches

Conversely, the figure in Reclining Nude (Half Nude, Hands Raised) (1958) offers great import due to its overtly spiritual component and attention to detail in the sinuous, interconnected folds of fabric. The uplifted arms also add power and presence to the figure that none of the other paintings share. In the subject’s face, the relatively blank eyes give off a mask-like presence that brings us back to Von Schlippe’s interest in West African sculpture in all of its ritualistic or ceremonial forms.

Seascape (1978), oil on masonite, 20 x 24 inches
Seascape (1978), oil on masonite, 20 x 24 inches

Seascape (1978), which is solely painted in oil, ventures the furthest into the Surrealist realm. The composition has a sort of rocking motion, as if we are viewing the scene from a boat in choppy seas, as the looming sandy cliffs and flood of ocean water that shimmers in the distant horizon strain to gain their individual heights in the picture plane. Then you have the Houston to Boston leaning clouds above that create a clockwise rotation in the composition, giving the scene all of its endless movement. Ignoring all this upheaval is a seagull perched atop a small branch of a large piece of driftwood on the lower left of the painting. Facing outward and away from the center, the bird gives the narrative a bit of doubt to its truth, telling the viewer that all this commotion is imagined, pieced together from bits of memory and preconceptions.

Two Bottles (1958), oil on board, 14 ⅔ x 11 ¼ inches
Two Bottles (1958), oil on board, 14 ⅔ x 11 ¼ inches

As a still life painter, Von Schlippe is equally skilled. Still Life with Mushroom (1974) has that George Grosz, Otto Dix brand of intensity, while Two Bottles (1958) leans a bit more toward the softened and shimmering – closer to Giorgio Morandi, only with lots of detail in the reflective surfaces. All in all, a striking exhibition in one of the most distinctive and magnificent buildings in New England that is best known for its extensive collection of world class plaster casts such as Michelangelo’s Pietà and Moses, Donatello’s David and the Laocoön and His Sons by Baccio Bandinelli. A destination that is well worth the visit any time you are in Norwich, Connecticut.